Hogville

RB Sports Discussion => SEC Sports => Topic started by: Hawghiggs on October 02, 2017, 10:08:44 pm

Title: The SEC
Post by: Hawghiggs on October 02, 2017, 10:08:44 pm
 What has caused the SEC to decline? Was it the college football playoff?
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: HenduHog on October 02, 2017, 10:10:04 pm
What has caused the SEC to decline? Was it the college football playoff?

Coaches
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: HenduHog on October 02, 2017, 10:10:30 pm
Asked and answered in another thread
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Hawghiggs on October 02, 2017, 10:11:19 pm
Asked and answered in another thread

 Wasn't aware of the other thread.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: ShadowHawg on October 02, 2017, 10:49:51 pm
Coaches
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: JaketheSnake on October 03, 2017, 06:44:08 am
A rise in athletics across the nation.  Football players at the high school level are getting better.  They have better information on diets, strength training, speed training, specific speed training outside of their programs, constant camps to improve specific aspects of their games, etc. 

You cannt coach and train a kid to be DMac or 6'6 320 with quick feet... but you can do a lot with with that training.  Troy and NMST have future NFL players, Kareem Hunt was at Toledo, etc.  Athletes are catching up to the SEC.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Inhogswetrust on October 03, 2017, 06:56:15 am
A rise in athletics across the nation.  Football players at the high school level are getting better.  They have better information on diets, strength training, speed training, specific speed training outside of their programs, constant camps to improve specific aspects of their games, etc. 

You cannt coach and train a kid to be DMac or 6'6 320 with quick feet... but you can do a lot with with that training.  Troy and NMST have future NFL players, Kareem Hunt was at Toledo, etc.  Athletes are catching up to the SEC.

You forget that small schools have always had some players go to the NFL. Also that same stuff such as nutrition, strength and such are available for bigger SEC type schools as well as those around the country. Camps have been around for a long timer as well. The rise in athletics has occurred in other sports moreso than football. Especially yuck, soccer.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: jkstock04 on October 03, 2017, 06:57:09 am
Sure seemed like it coincided with the college football playoff.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: jgphillips3 on October 03, 2017, 07:12:08 am
The downfall started when we went full retard with a 25 player hard cap.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Deep Shoat on October 03, 2017, 07:14:04 am
Nick Saban
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Boss Hog in the Arkansas on October 03, 2017, 07:19:45 am
What has caused the SEC to decline? Was it the college football playoff?
Nick Saban, for 2 reasons.
1. Other good coaches (Mark Richt, Les Miles) began getting fired because they couldn't beat nick saban nor could they replicate sabans production.
2. This also ties into the 1st reason, coaches don't want to come to a league where they will be constantly under pressure to beat arguably the greatest college football coach of all time. Who wants to coach at a school where they can win 9 to 10 games per year and still be on the hot seat?

The SEC has become unbalanced and it is 100% on Saban
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Razorfox on October 03, 2017, 07:20:20 am
Nick Saban

My list of contributing factors:

1) Bama dominance, i.e. Nick Saban
2) Spurrier retirement
3) Urban Meyer departure from SEC
4) Jim Harbaugh to Michigan
5) Ole Miss scandal
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: rhames on October 03, 2017, 07:21:29 am
These things go in cycles.



Saban getting coaches fired and running the thing for that past 10 years doesn't help.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: jkstock04 on October 03, 2017, 07:22:35 am
My list of contributing factors:

1) Bama dominance, i.e. Nick Saban
2) Spurrier retirement
3) Urban Meyer departure from SEC
4) Jim Harbaugh to Michigan
5) Ole Miss scandal

Pretty good list there. The Big 10 rise from the ashes was really something. Started with Harbaugh to Michigan...and I agree had a hand in this as well.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: rhames on October 03, 2017, 07:24:13 am
My list of contributing factors:

1) Bama dominance, i.e. Nick Saban
2) Spurrier retirement
3) Urban Meyer departure from SEC
4) Jim Harbaugh to Michigan
5) Ole Miss scandal



1. For sure
2.  Eh he had 2 or 3 good years at SC
3.  For sure
4. Maybe a little but not entirely
5. That really just happened. The effects,  mostly to ole miss,  have really yet to be seen. Unless you're talking about just the Hugh thing.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: hoghiker on October 03, 2017, 07:25:23 am
Saban and playoffs. Saban is great for Bama. He's the poison pill for the SEC. That kind of dominance is bad for any league and the SEC is no different. Plus all the money floating around.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: IronHog on October 03, 2017, 07:25:53 am
A rise in athletics across the nation.  Football players at the high school level are getting better.  They have better information on diets, strength training, speed training, specific speed training outside of their programs, constant camps to improve specific aspects of their games, etc. 

You cannt coach and train a kid to be DMac or 6'6 320 with quick feet... but you can do a lot with with that training.  Troy and NMST have future NFL players, Kareem Hunt was at Toledo, etc.  Athletes are catching up to the SEC.


Actually the "decline" of the SEC has more to do with the rise of the spread offense and a lack of QB play within the SEC
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: rhames on October 03, 2017, 07:26:56 am
How has the playoff hurt sec dominance? Not trying to be argumentative just trying to understand that angle



Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: JaketheSnake on October 03, 2017, 07:29:50 am
You forget that small schools have always had some players go to the NFL. Also that same stuff such as nutrition, strength and such are available for bigger SEC type schools as well as those around the country. Camps have been around for a long timer as well. The rise in athletics has occurred in other sports moreso than football. Especially yuck, soccer.
Those levels have all risen.  There are caps on how big and strong you can get.  The SEC has always grabbed what they wanted, but when there is more to go around, smaller schools benefit.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Razorfox on October 03, 2017, 07:36:29 am

1. For sure
2.  Eh he had 2 or 3 good years at SC
3.  For sure
4. Maybe a little but not entirely
5. That really just happened. The effects,  mostly to ole miss,  have really yet to be seen. Unless you're talking about just the Hugh thing.

1. We agree then
2. He brought success to a program that used to be an easy win for others.  He made them another relevant and successful team that went to mid and high level bowls every year. 
3. We agree then
4. He's attracting talent and helping to make the Big 10 overall more successful
5. This did just happen, but Ole Miss was performing at a relatively high level and maybe getting better as long as he was there.  Now they will likely return to their more normal level. 

Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: hoghiker on October 03, 2017, 07:42:00 am
How has the playoff hurt sec dominance? Not trying to be argumentative just trying to understand that angle




For the same reason college basketball starts and finishes with the NCAA tournament. The feel of it is different. Winning 9 games with a bowl thrown in there for good measure doesn't do it for most fan bases anymore. Certainly not the SEC. The entire Saturday, go to a game, buy a hot dog visit with old friends angle on college football has been morphing toward  a different reality for some time. The play offs just made it official. Playoffs was a move toward NFL not so lite. No charm in that. Just win, win, win. My take.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: rhames on October 03, 2017, 07:55:57 am
For the same reason college basketball starts and finishes with the NCAA tournament. The feel of it is different. Winning 9 games with a bowl thrown in there for good measure doesn't do it for most fan bases anymore. Certainly not the SEC. The entire Saturday, go to a game, buy a hot dog visit with old friends angle on college football has been morphing toward  a different reality for some time. The play offs just made it official. Playoffs was a move toward NFL not so lite. No charm in that. Just win, win, win. My take.



But the ACC is still viewed as the power house for basketball, no?
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Nashville Fan on October 03, 2017, 08:02:50 am
Got to add expansion to the list. Only so many SEC caliber athletes in the south and now you have two more teams trying to pull 170 to their teams.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: DeltaBoy on October 03, 2017, 08:06:32 am
The downfall started when we went full retard with a 25 player hard cap.


This in the 1960's Royal had nearly 200 players on scholarship at Texas cause as he said " They will get a great education and I keep Arkansas and TAMU from getting them.

As the Cap was set and started dropping good football players wind up many times as smaller schools. If that School ie Troy gets enough of those players together with a solid coach they can nip you.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: hogmolar on October 03, 2017, 08:08:43 am
Nick Saban, for 2 reasons.
1. Other good coaches (Mark Richt, Les Miles) began getting fired because they couldn't beat nick saban nor could they replicate sabans production.
2. This also ties into the 1st reason, coaches don't want to come to a league where they will be constantly under pressure to beat arguably the greatest college football coach of all time. Who wants to coach at a school where they can win 9 to 10 games per year and still be on the hot seat?

The SEC has become unbalanced and it is 100% on Saban
This... plus I am also sure that other conferences are using this as a recruiting tool as well, "Hey 4 and 5 star recruit not going to BAMA why go the other SEC schools where you will never get a chance at the playoff because we all know Bama will be there."
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: MissippHog on October 03, 2017, 08:11:19 am
Nick Saban, for 2 reasons.
1. Other good coaches (Mark Richt, Les Miles) began getting fired because they couldn't beat nick saban nor could they replicate sabans production.
2. This also ties into the 1st reason, coaches don't want to come to a league where they will be constantly under pressure to beat arguably the greatest college football coach of all time. Who wants to coach at a school where they can win 9 to 10 games per year and still be on the hot seat?

The SEC has become unbalanced and it is 100% on Saban
Bingo!
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: ChicoHog on October 03, 2017, 08:22:56 am
My list of contributing factors:

1) Bama dominance, i.e. Nick Saban
2) Spurrier retirement
3) Urban Meyer departure from SEC
4) Jim Harbaugh to Michigan
5) Ole Miss scandal

1.  Absolutely the biggest reason
2.  Not so much.  They had hit another down cycle as he was not recruiting as well and Clemson was taking all the hype in SCarolina. 
3.  Not so much.  He left one year after Tebow was gone.  He realized he couldn't win without him and did not recruit well to replace him. 
4.  A little bit as the Big Ten has improved with Harbaugh and Franklin.
5.   a little bit but too recent
6.  Too many good players leaving after their junior and even red shirt soph seasons.  Helps balance out with teams full of juniors and seniors.  Look at LSU every year as they lose many juniors.  Bama does also but they have Saban. 
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: hoghiker on October 03, 2017, 08:24:41 am

But the ACC is still viewed as the power house for basketball, no?
ACC is a power basketball conference for sure. No dominate player like Bama. Duke and NC have it going on but some other notables. College basketball is worse than football. Kentucky, and previously mentioned ACC schools, marriage to one and dones makes a mockery of college sports. I'll watch the Arkansas/Kentucky game but don't get too teared up about it.  I'm not sure college hoops is redeemable at this point.  Football is moving in that direction. I hope it gets redirected before its charm is all lost.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: jcbville on October 03, 2017, 08:38:27 am
Nick Saban and Alabama.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Hogs-n-Roses on October 03, 2017, 08:38:32 am
Bama has what, 50 4 n 5 star players on the bench.  Take away the mild contenders of Georgia and Auburn, even LSU as they have near that many 4 n 5 stars. That's 8 teams getting 6+ 4 n 5 star players(if they were distributed to SEC teams). Add 6+ 4 n 5 star players to this team and then say 3 extra each year and how would we be. I say it would be a heck of a difference in us and every other team. Somehow Bama is doing now what Bryant and Darrell Royal did years ago.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: hawg66 on October 03, 2017, 08:44:57 am
Nick Saban
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: hogcard1964 on October 03, 2017, 08:46:06 am
What has caused the SEC to decline? Was it the college football playoff?

Poor coaching within the conference.

There's 4 or 5 head coaches that will not be coaching in the conference next season and there's 2 or 3 that are heading out at the latest after the 2018 season.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: jcbville on October 03, 2017, 08:53:06 am
Also what should concern people is that it appears Saban is attempting to build a system that will let the next coach step right in and continue to keep Bama the sole dominating force in the SEC.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: hoghiker on October 03, 2017, 09:26:37 am
Also what should concern people is that it appears Saban is attempting to build a system that will let the next coach step right in and continue to keep Bama the sole dominating force in the SEC.
If anyone can do it, it's Saban but I'm still betting post Saban is pretty much like any other passing of a legend. Some harder times after he leaves. Nick is the keystone of that program. Pull him out and hope it doesn't fall.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Atlhogfan1 on October 03, 2017, 09:31:23 am
Coaching changes.
Early NFL attrition.
Just the normal cycle of programs. 
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Atlhogfan1 on October 03, 2017, 10:09:25 am
I do question though how much the B1G has actually risen. 
Last year bowl record:   3-7,  SEC was 6-7 in a down year
B1G losses included: Clemson 31 - Oh St 0, Florida 30 Iowa 3, Tenn 38 Neb 24
Their 3 wins came over Western Mich, Pitt and Wash St.

In 2015-16 while the SEC went 9-2, the B1G was 5-5.
Bama beat the B1G Champs 38-0 in the playoff.
Iowa lost the Rose Bowl 45-16.
Tenn beat NW 45-6.
UGa beat Penn St.

2014-15
B1G 6-5 in bowls and finished with 3 ranked teams, the SEC was 7-5 with 6 ranked teams


As far as this season goes, Penn St has a good team with probably the best player.  Oh St has struggled offensively and lost at home to OU.  Mich's offense is not good.  Wisconsin will play one ranked team all season:  Michigan at home.  And then their opponent in the B1G CG. 

The depth of the conference has gotten better by the improvements at Penn St, Oh St and Michigan.  Wisconsin will win because they are the best set up to in their division.  Michigan St may have had its run.  Nebraska is a has been.  Iowa will just keep being Iowa - few athletes but will compete hard and win enough.  Purdue looks better but they don't have many athletes.  The rest? 

I do agree the SEC is not what it has been.  However, UGa may be heading to being that program who will step into the void left by recent NC programs Florida, LSU and AU. 


Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Inhogswetrust on October 03, 2017, 10:23:28 am
Sure seemed like it coincided with the college football playoff.

No cause and effect proven.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Inhogswetrust on October 03, 2017, 10:25:17 am
Those levels have all risen.  There are caps on how big and strong you can get.  The SEC has always grabbed what they wanted, but when there is more to go around, smaller schools benefit.

Good point. But caps on scholarships have been around a long time. The SEC was dominant after they came.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Inhogswetrust on October 03, 2017, 10:27:09 am

Actually the "decline" of the SEC has more to do with the rise of the spread offense and a lack of QB play within the SEC

Things started to change a little bit when Spurrier and his Florida players played the Fun and Gun years ago. Several SEC schools have played more "wide open" type offenses over the years. Even Kentucky did with HM. I admit those types of offenses need a certain type of QB that we really don't have in the SEC very much right now. But it hasn't been long ago when we did have. It is ironic that the one dominant team in the SEC is not known as a wide open spread type offense. That goes to show you any type is fine with the right coaching and personnel.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: jgphillips3 on October 03, 2017, 11:33:15 am
To clarify my earlier comment, the 25 cap on recruits prevents power cycling players in and out of your program.  Take us for example.  Supposedly, our retention was going to be a good thing.  However, now we seem to have a roster full of guys who aren’t quite good enough and only 12 new guys we can bring in.  Other teams that were used to churning 10 players a year out can’t do that anymore and you are seeing the true elite recruiters like Saban stay on top while the rest of us can no longer take risks and cycle players to catch up to the Bama’s of the world.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: phadedhawg on October 03, 2017, 12:02:55 pm
I think the SEC has been a victim of it's own success.  For years there were too many good teams and bc of the Alabama factor, good coaches didn't stick around for long.   

The SEC losing it's pop is the best thing that could happen for Arkansas.  Unfortunately we don't seem to be in a position to capitalize any time soon.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: ShadowHawg on October 03, 2017, 12:25:19 pm
The sec has declined back to the rest of college football. It's hardly lagging behind. Bama, Georgia, and Auburn are as good as any in College football.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: razorhead94 on October 03, 2017, 12:29:29 pm
The SEC EAST decline....or actually they've been bad for a while.  The West is what has carried this conference since 2008.  Three different teams from that division have won a National Championship.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: jkstock04 on October 03, 2017, 12:40:08 pm
No cause and effect proven.
Agreed. Just seemed to me like that was the beginning of the slide. I guess I could possibly see it as opening up more recruiting angles for other conferences/schools.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: JaketheSnake on October 03, 2017, 04:37:43 pm
Good point. But caps on scholarships have been around a long time. The SEC was dominant after they came.
I agree, but football training has taken huge strides over the past 10 years.  15 years ago most high schools would. Take part in just a handful of 7-on-7 summer camps.  Now most bigger schools have them each week.  Summer weight lifting has changed. Nutrition has changed, everything is getting better and athletes are buying.

Everything in this thread works toward the same goal.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: swinemaster on October 03, 2017, 04:56:55 pm
LSU, Tennessee and Florida are a mess. 

Everyone else is just about like they are year in and year out.  Now we have 3 power teams that can compete with anyone and 1 elite team that is the favorite to win it all.  Still a pretty tough conference. 
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: LRHawg on October 03, 2017, 05:35:20 pm
There's many factors, but I think it starts and ends with Saban's coaching dominance and the expectations of other schools that want to compete against Bama.

Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: HardCore on October 03, 2017, 05:39:44 pm
Poor Coaching choices & rediculous buyouts
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: sir-pigs-a-lot on October 03, 2017, 05:46:36 pm
Coaches

When Gus is the 2nd best coach in your league, you've got poor coaches. You're right on the money with this.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: WilsonHog on October 03, 2017, 06:27:26 pm
 :puke:
Nick Saban, for 2 reasons.
1. Other good coaches (Mark Richt, Les Miles) began getting fired because they couldn't beat nick saban nor could they replicate sabans production.
2. This also ties into the 1st reason, coaches don't want to come to a league where they will be constantly under pressure to beat arguably the greatest college football coach of all time. Who wants to coach at a school where they can win 9 to 10 games per year and still be on the hot seat?

The SEC has become unbalanced and it is 100% on Saban

This is part of it, but there’s more.

Football is king in our part of the world, and fan bases are off the chain. Coaches are a fraternity, as are their agents. Consider that Mark Richt got run off from Georgia after averaging 9.7 wins a year for 15 years. Les Miles? Shown the door at LSU after winning a national championship and averaging 9.5 wins a year for 12 years. Butch Jones has won 18 games the last two years at Tennessee, and he’s a dead man walking in Knoxville.

Does that sound like a conference you would want to coach in, if you could make the same money elsewhere? Same money, more job security, no Saban. That’s a no-brainer.

I listened to Finebaum today. He asked Geoff Calkins if Tennessee had a short list. Calkins said, “Yeah, of guys they aren’t going to get. The way these things usually work is schools go into it thinking they’re going to get Nick Saban, and they walk away with Charlie Strong.” (Or Tom Herman, and they get Ed O).

Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: jcbville on October 03, 2017, 06:52:16 pm
Couple of quotes from volnation to brighten your day lol...

“Butch Jones skis in jeans.”

“Butch Jones has a Blockbuster card.”
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Swestwill66 on October 03, 2017, 06:53:17 pm
Mediocre coaches and in some cases replacing mediocre with awful coaches! ( Ed Orgeron, odom)
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: GoHogs1091 on October 03, 2017, 07:13:28 pm
Several factors.

Other than Saban, the rest of the head coaching is mediocre.

The Quarterback play as a whole across the SEC is subpar.

The Defensive Line play as a whole across the SEC is not what it used to be.  Associated with this aspect is the so-so Offensive Line play across the conference that can't consistently take advantage of there being lower level Defensive Line play across the conference.

There are no bonafide elite Running Backs in the SEC. 

The rise of 3 football programs, Clemson, Ohio State, and Michigan, has watered down the talent across the SEC.  Elite High School talent knows that they can go to one of those 3 programs and receive better coaching than in the SEC (other than Saban's coaching).
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: ShadowHawg on October 03, 2017, 07:23:25 pm
Several factors.

Other than Saban, the rest of the head coaching is mediocre.

The Quarterback play as a whole across the SEC is subpar.

The Defensive Line play as a whole across the SEC is not what it used to be.  Associated with this aspect is the so-so Offensive Line play across the conference that can't consistently take advantage of there being lower level Defensive Line play across the conference.

There are no bonafide elite Running Backs in the SEC. 

The rise of 3 football programs, Clemson, Ohio State, and Michigan, has watered down the talent across the SEC.  Elite High School talent knows that they can go to one of those 3 programs and receive better coaching than in the SEC (other than Saban's coaching).

Lol

Ohio State was fine during the sec title domination. The Big XII was much better also.

Michigan is one team! They aren't going to bring down a whole conference.

Clemson was recruiting at a high level.

It's bad coaching hires.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: GoHogs1091 on October 03, 2017, 07:28:29 pm
Lol

Ohio State was fine during the sec title domination. The Big XII was much better also.

Michigan is one team! They aren't going to bring down a whole conference.

Clemson was recruiting at a high level.

It's bad coaching hires.

Ohio State and Michigan didn't get as much elite talent until Meyer and Harbaugh were hired.

Clemson recruited well in the past, but their recruiting went to a higher level after they hired Venables.

There is only so much elite High School talent available, and those 3 programs now get more of it than they used to.

The SEC is basically a shell of its former self.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: TebowHater on October 03, 2017, 07:57:50 pm
100% was conference expansion. There are a fixed number of kids in the south and/or a fixed number of star athletes who are only going to go to an SEC school.

Have you ever had your fantasy league expand from 12 to 14 teams? What happened to the quality of your team
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Swestwill66 on October 03, 2017, 08:14:19 pm
Saban great Coach! Great recruiting!
L.S.U great recruiting, could match Bama. Difference, coach.
Auburn, great recruiting, could match Bama. Difference, coach.
Florida, great recruiting, could match bama, difference,coach.
Tennessee, great recruiting, could match bama,difference, coach.
aTm,great recruiting,could match bama,difference, coach.
Georgia, great recruiting, could match Bama and may do it in the next couple of years. Coach is Saban disciple.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: ShadowHawg on October 03, 2017, 08:17:09 pm
100% was conference expansion. There are a fixed number of kids in the south and/or a fixed number of star athletes who are only going to go to an SEC school.

Have you ever had your fantasy league expand from 12 to 14 teams? What happened to the quality of your team

So Mizzou has leached all the talent? A&M pretty much works Texas for theirs.

Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: NaturalStateReb on October 03, 2017, 08:38:18 pm
What has caused the SEC to decline? Was it the college football playoff?

Quality of coaching has dropped dramatically.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Hawghiggs on October 03, 2017, 08:45:23 pm
 Think the playoff was designed to limit how many teams got a chance at a national title from any given conference. Alabama and Saban have changed the perception of the conference, and eroded what little chance smaller programs in the SEC will ever have. Now only 5 of the 14 programs in the SEC actually have a chance to play for a National title. Those program's are  1, Alabama. 2, Florida. 3,Georgia. 4, LSU. 5, Texas A&M. Now Auburn and Tennessee can still have strong programs. But with limited recruiting base. Getting the only CFP slot is out of reach.  For the other 9 programs in the SEC. We have become nothing more than scheduling fodder.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: WilsonHog on October 03, 2017, 08:50:06 pm
Check out this stat from Chris Low:

“In the last 35 head coaching hires in the SEC, there have only been 3 sitting head coaches from power five schools hired.”

In comparison with other conferences, “None of the others have hired a ton, but the SEC has hired fewer of those guys in that span than anybody.”
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Großer Kriegschwein on October 03, 2017, 08:51:55 pm
Check out this stat from Chris Low:

“In the last 35 head coaching hires in the SEC, there have only been 3 sitting head coaches from power five schools hired."

Means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: WilsonHog on October 03, 2017, 08:54:39 pm
Means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.

What it means is you’d better have one of two things: (1) an AD astute at identifying coaching talent; or (b) a whole lot of luck.

Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: ChicoHog on October 03, 2017, 09:17:22 pm
I don't know if it's so much bad coaching as it is  Saban makes other coaches look bad.  Bielema  did fine at Wisconsin.  Jones was good at Cincinnati and CMU.   McElwain was good at CSU.  I just think the Bama power with Saban has made the other teams worse and their coaches look worse than they really are.  I bet if you brought in just about any other coaches from any other teams except the elite few it would not change anything. Why would someone want to coach against Saban?  it drove Meyer out. 
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: From Tusk Till Dawn on October 03, 2017, 10:23:57 pm
I agree with the coaching part, the pressure from the fanbase is immense.  For example, most are critical of LSU for firing miles who averaged 9 wins and wasnt saban yet we are ready to do the same with Bielema essentially for not being miles.  Everyone in the sec cant have 9-10 win seasons every year but every fan base expects it.  I believe theres more patience at non power 5 schools and similar to basketball & smaller schools the teams are together longer, so they gel over time because the nfl isnt robbing them of talent in year 2 or 3.  Peterson at boise comes to mind.  He was in no hurry to take a bigger job and had offers from many.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Großer Kriegschwein on October 03, 2017, 10:47:13 pm
What it means is you’d better have one of two things: (1) an AD astute at identifying coaching talent; or (b) a whole lot of luck.

A whole lot of luck seems more likely.

Saban wasn't exactly a world beater at Michigan State.

6–5–1
6–6
7–5
6–6
9–2

Only finished higher than 5th in the B1G one time. 
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: WilsonHog on October 03, 2017, 10:50:48 pm
A whole lot of luck seems more likely.

Saban wasn't exactly a world beater at Michigan State.

6–5–1
6–6
7–5
6–6
9–2

Only finished higher than 5th in the B1G one time.

Which is probably the best evidence I have ever seen for the proposition that success is more about the players than anything else. For all the talk about Saban’s “process,” it obviously is more effective when he has the best players in his locker room.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: Großer Kriegschwein on October 03, 2017, 10:56:28 pm
Which is probably the best evidence I have ever seen for the proposition that success is more about the players than anything else. For all the talk about Saban’s “process,” it obviously is more effective when he has the best players in his locker room.

Yup.

We can probably agree that * rankings are about measurables and offers. Even on the OL that seems to be the truth. Rarely do you see a pro-style offense in High School, so you will have to coach up the talent that you can find. But measurables already existing sure help in the process of development.
Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: George S. Pigton on October 04, 2017, 09:43:58 pm
Nick Saban, Nick Saban, Nick Saban

His success lead to the popularity, popularity lead to money and other big coaches being hired to compete with Nick.

That was found to be impossible, great coaches run off and less than coaches hired to replace.

I also have to think that for some reason, QB play in the age of High School QB's running spreads has hurt the ability
of College Coaches finding QB's that can run actual offenses other than a spread.  Coaches do not teach linemen and QB's
how to play from under center, thus the overall effectiveness of QB play is down. 


Title: Re: The SEC
Post by: depressed_fan on October 04, 2017, 11:05:08 pm
What has caused the SEC to decline? Was it the college football playoff?

I don't think it was the college football play off. I think it starts with social media age and too many fans having unrealistic expectations. Players don't seem to care as much as they used too. The coaches in the conference right now are way under experienced then they were around 2003.  The SEC has been in a steady decline since then.

Think back when Phil Fulmer, Lou Holtz, Mark Riecht, Steve Spurrier, Jackie Sherril, Tommy Tuberville, David Cutcliff, Rich Brooks, and HDN were all in the league. Back then it was Alabama going through mediocre coaches like Shula. All future hall of fame coaches with the exception of HDN, who'll end up in Arkansas hall of fame.  Then there was some musical chairs with some other good coaches like Spurrier recycling to SC, Urban Meyer, Les Miles, Dan Mullen having some good years.

For the most part, the coaches now stay on the hot seat, the players don't care as much, not as many High School boys are playing football, and the ones who are , are just trying to get to the NFL.  The coaches know they can't please the fans. They get their big contract, they know they are set for life, and they just go through the motions with players who probably don't care if they win or lose.