THE REFS TRIED TO STOP US BUT FAILED!!!!

[synthartist69]

THE REFS finally couldn't dictate the outcome of this game for once!!! So many no calls and bad calls it was pathetic... like the last game and Texas A&M..

[Soooie21]

2 facemask...great effort by the team...

[mountainhog]

Obvious face mask on the hatcher catch, and what the punt and ole miss player touched the ball??

[oldbear]

The saddest part is that Coley has to sit the first half of Auburn for blocking for an interception and making contact to the chest. Add in the Phantom pass interference and the rather ridiculous offsides call. That was crazy.

[mckinneyhog5]

They failed to g8ve the game to Ole Piss...thus they're failures. Some crooked.darn.tonigbt especially that ejection. Pure bs

[Lanny]

Poorly called game

[WorfHog]

Curles needs to be shown the door. He's a high school ref at best.

[root_hawg]

The offsides they showed and it was clear .... the targeting was for the head to head contact.... on the punt he did touch it but had already broken the plane of the goal line ... now some of the others ... yep missed a few...  sorry but those three were correct

[BDSCT51]

Poorly called game

Being way too generous here Big L! It was worse than poor!

[Torqued pork]

The offsides they showed and it was clear .... the targeting was for the head to head contact.... on the punt he did touch it but had already broken the plane of the goal line ... now some of the others ... yep missed a few...  sorry but those three were correct

It wasn't head to head

[DeltaHog66]

The targeting call was a joke.  I thought the 3rd down pass that was knocked out by santos was a fumble. Just my opinion.

[hawgfan4life]

Tip of ball was barely touching the white line on the field and the black line was through the white line.  In other words only the toes of the DB was in the neutral zone against a WR lined up deep off of LOS..  I wouldn't have an issue with the call of the DT on the same side for Ole Miss hadn't lined up farther in the neutral zone all night. 

I have watched two other games and listened to the official in the booth explain why the same thing wasn't targeting and player wasn't ejected.  Refs are very inconsistent and subjective in their interpretation of the rule.

[Pigasaurus]

It wasn't head to head

Ole Miss player threw his head back as he was going down. 

[oldbear]

There was no head contact on the targeting. Only looked that way from the view from behind the siss player. The offsides literally never gets called in that position. You can't Judge by the computer generated line. No human could possibly defend the pass interference on Sprinkle. It doesn't come close to the definition. The touch back was simple and correct.

[Bacons Rebellion]

It wasn't head to head

It doesn't have to be anymore.

I don't agree with 80% of the targeting calls I see, Hogs involved or not. Sometimes it's incidental, sometimes it looks to me like the receiver is trying to get his helmet in the way and draw the call.

[davglo35]

Curles makes me wanna puke! He is the worst in the college game! Total dufus.

[SemperFi]

I'm pretty sure that the UA can appeal to the SEC to have that hit reviewed and the decision reversed. Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm sure that I've seen/heard of that happening in the recent past.

[hview]

They need to look at that targeting rule. Some of you might have seen the play differently, but I didn't agree with the ejection.

[alohawg]

Curles makes me wanna puke! He is the worst in the college game! Total dufus.

Or he's the best if you're on the paying end...

[RzRbAcK18]

Funny side note, all the Gameday yackarses picked us to lose, and lose easily. Suck it.

[Calling All Hogs]

If we are providing State Trooper protection for Curles at the games we need to stop.

[supersaint]

When yo watch the replays of the 4th and 16 play, watch the LT tackle Beanum by his neck. Pretty blatant hold.

[root_hawg]

Head hit the face mask, guarantee when they appeal it to the SEC office, it will get upheld.

[ronmahony]

Right after that bogus targeting call, the ol sis player tackled Austin with both hands around his helmet-face mask. Now that looked a whole more like targeting to me.

[root_hawg]

and they called roughing the passer ....

[Arkansas Fan]

The false start penalty on Ole Miss looked like it should've been offsides on us. If that was the case, Kelly might've picked up the first down.

[Ugly Uncle]

The false start penalty on Ole Miss looked like it should've been offsides on us. If that was the case, Kelly might've picked up the first down.

I went back and watched that play from the beginning.  That tackle flinched his shoulder which caused wise to jump then he responded to Wise.  The tackle did flinch first.

[ricepig]

The false start penalty on Ole Miss looked like it should've been offsides on us. If that was the case, Kelly might've picked up the first down.

He still fumbled backwards, or he might have been sacked, or thrown a pick, or.....

[hogpc]

The offsides they showed and it was clear .... the targeting was for the head to head contact.... on the punt he did touch it but had already broken the plane of the goal line ... now some of the others ... yep missed a few...  sorry but those three were correct

I agree 100% - the three you mention were the correct call but the PI on Sprinkle was BS and they did miss what looked like a facemask against Hatcher (I think).

[hogpc]

Head hit the face mask, guarantee when they appeal it to the SEC office, it will get upheld.

Yep!  That's twice now, the boy needs to learn some discipline on the field.

[jm]

The off sides simply can't be called accurately on a player that far outside away from the ball with the naked eye. The frustrating thing for Razorback fans is that no advantage was gained because the receiver was playing off the line.

[root_hawg]

Yea that PI on Sprinkle was a phantom call

[root_hawg]

The off sides simply can't be called accurately on a player that far outside away from the ball with the naked eye. The frustrating thing for Razorback fans is that no advantage was gained because the receiver was playing off the line.

In the telecast, they said the linesman had warned him already...no need to be that close to even make it an issue

[PorkRinds]

In the telecast, they said the linesman had warned him already...no need to be that close to even make it an issue

Correction. They said he tried to warn him but it was too loud.

[Arkansas Fan]

He still fumbled backwards, or he might have been sacked, or thrown a pick, or.....

Smartass, Ramirez could've very easily not have made that hit that popped the ball out.

[carolinahogger]

Yea that PI on Sprinkle was a phantom call

That was remarkably similar to the call against our defensive lineman near the end of the Swindle in the Swamp.  It was also the Curles crew there IIRC.

[DeltaBoy]

CURLES needs to be gone.

[TebowHater]

That was remarkably similar to the call against our defensive lineman near the end of the Swindle in the Swamp.  It was also the Curles crew there IIRC.

It was, effectively, the exact same call. It was our guy...getting hit. I can still remember Gary Danielson saying "what is Malcom Shephard supposed to...that's him...getting hit? I don't get that call"

Same thing here, Sprinkle got hit, what is he supposed to do. Both 15 yard penalties that directly affected scoring (points for Florida, lack of points for us).

[ricepig]

Smartass, Ramirez could've very easily not have made that hit that popped the ball out.

Or hit him 5 yards earlier, you can't pick and choose what may or may not have happened, or can you?

[Bacons Rebellion]

I agree 100% - the three you mention were the correct call but the PI on Sprinkle was BS and they did miss what looked like a facemask against Hatcher (I think).

the Sprinkle PI call was the only thing I thought was blatantly wrong. Some other calls could have gone either way.

I figured Coley was gone as soon as I saw the replay. The officials are willing to sit a not-very-guilty player to make a point.

[clew]

Only the replay booth saved that early touchdown on the kickoff return. Two refs let that one go--just stared at it instead of calling him out of bounds knowing it has to be indisputable to overturn.

Thought that one towards the end was obviously an ole miss fumble instead of an incomplete pass. He had two feet on the ground before the ball was dislodged.

[Arkansas Fan]

Or hit him 5 yards earlier, you can't pick and choose what may or may not have happened, or can you?

Yes, because he wasn't hit five yards earlier.

[aaronpjones21]

The OPI on Sprinkle near the end of the 1st half is possibly the worst call I've ever seen in my entire life against the Hogs. And I know there have been many, but I don't know that I can think of one worse. This includes 2009 Florida. This includes the 7 OT win over Kentucky (which I thought was brutally officiated). This includes the holding last week.

That was a brutal call.

[S.A.D.C]

In the telecast, they said the linesman had warned him already...no need to be that close to even make it an issue

Does anyone else appreciate the irony of one of our CBs being called for offsides!?  Al

[Pig in the Pokey]

They need to look at that targeting rule. Some of you might have seen the play differently, but I didn't agree with the ejection.

like 3 plays later dude body slams allen by his facemask with a much harder head blow and although they called the 15 yd penalty you can't help but notice the inconsistency of Curles' crew. They are the crookedest bunch around.

[Pig in the Pokey]

Does anyone else appreciate the irony of one of our CBs being called for offsides!?  Al

he'd never been that close to line line before in his 4 years on the hill!

[rljjr]

Obvious face mask on the hatcher catch, and what the punt and ole miss player touched the ball??

I wanted to see a closer replay of that. I thought he might have touched it too. Apparently nobody else thought that.

[Pig in the Pokey]

Only the replay booth saved that early touchdown on the kickoff return. Two refs let that one go--just stared at it instead of calling him out of bounds knowing it has to be indisputable to overturn.

Thought that one towards the end was obviously an ole miss fumble instead of an incomplete pass. He had two feet on the ground before the ball was dislodged.

yeah, that was a catch. he tucked it away and took another full stride. If it had been us they definitely would have called that a fumble.

[rljjr]

The offsides they showed and it was clear .... the targeting was for the head to head contact.... on the punt he did touch it but had already broken the plane of the goal line ... now some of the others ... yep missed a few...  sorry but those three were correct

It sure looked like the ball hit him in the field of play ... I'll have to look back at that one. I was expecting to come back from the commercial break with a review ongoing. Oh well.

[Hoggish1]

the targeting was for the head to head contact....

Don't know what you were looking at, but that was not targeting.