Chuck says Mo St. "doesn't match up with us"

[Hog Bounty Hunter]

He is probably right, says we are going to win it is just a matter of by how much.  Again I think he is correct.  One could say the same thing about USC, it's not a matter of if they will beat us, it is just to determined by how much.

[TulsaHawg]

 

He is probably right, says we are going to win it is just a matter of by how much. Again I think he is correct. One could say the same thing about USC, it's not a matter of if they will beat us, it is just to determined by how much.

People were saying things like that a couple of years agi when we were heading to Austin.

I don't agree that we are to USC what MS is to us.

[Hog Bounty Hunter]

He is probably right, says we are going to win it is just a matter of by how much. Again I think he is correct. One could say the same thing about USC, it's not a matter of if they will beat us, it is just to determined by how much.

People were saying things like that a couple of years agi when we were heading to Austin.

I don't agree that we are to USC what MS is to us.

You are probably right, USC is a whole lot better than us than we are better than Mo St.

[arkhogdog61]

I say bull$hit their offence on a scale of 10 is probaly a 9 ours a 6 defence they lost alot i say 7 ours a 8 so not so fast my friend i say shocker ark 28 usc 20   GO HOGS

[BigPapaHawg]

He is probably right, says we are going to win it is just a matter of by how much. Again I think he is correct. One could say the same thing about USC, it's not a matter of if they will beat us, it is just to determined by how much.

This is absolutely wrong, we will be much better than you think and could actually pull off a win!

[Dances With Hogs]

61, are you still on meds?

[Porquemada]

With insight like this, it's little wonder he has his own sports radio call-in show.

[HogInMemphis]

He is probably right, says we are going to win it is just a matter of by how much.  Again I think he is correct.  One could say the same thing about USC, it's not a matter of if they will beat us, it is just to determined by how much.

That Chuck, he's really worth his weight in gold. Not even game week and he already knows enough to say that Mo. St. doesn't match up with us. That's pure genius right there.

[TulsaHogFan]

He is probably right, says we are going to win it is just a matter of by how much. Again I think he is correct. One could say the same thing about USC, it's not a matter of if they will beat us, it is just to determined by how much.

People were saying things like that a couple of years agi when we were heading to Austin.

I don't agree that we are to USC what MS is to us.

You are probably right, USC is a whole lot better than us than we are better than Mo St.

Nice post hog fan.  People like this make me sick. 

[junkyardhog]

He is probably right, says we are going to win it is just a matter of by how much. Again I think he is correct. One could say the same thing about USC, it's not a matter of if they will beat us, it is just to determined by how much.

I remember one game in 92 or 93 where we were saying the same thing. It was my first game. I was harassing the people taking me to the game because my girlfriends' brother just graduated from the opponents team.

Remember them? Citadel

[attachment deleted by admin]

[GorillaJMonsoon]

On paper we wouldn't have had a prayer in the 78 Orange Bowl against OU. Anything can happen, especially when you are overlooked.

[TulsaHawg]

He is probably right, says we are going to win it is just a matter of by how much. Again I think he is correct. One could say the same thing about USC, it's not a matter of if they will beat us, it is just to determined by how much.

I remember one game in 92 or 93 where we were saying the same thing. It was my first game. I was harassing the people taking me to the game because my girlfriends' brother just graduated from the opponents team.

Remember them? Citadel

And we would have been better off had we NOT PLAYED The Citadel!

[Thehammer]

On paper we wouldn't have had a prayer in the 78 Orange Bowl against OU. Anything can happen, especially when you are overlooked.

We should be able to line up and just out-athlete Mizzou State, so saying that they don't match up with us is akin to saying a ton=2000 pounds. 

I do not believe USC is so superior to us as compared to UA and Mizzou State.  However, I still think we get a good spanking out there.  One of the above posters brought up a good point.   They did lose six starters off defense.  If I were Nutt, I'd sit down and look really hard at USC's matchup with Virginia Tech last year.  Beamer kept the Trojans off balance all night by mixing in the option with p/a passing.   Sadly, Nutt really isn't an option coach.

[Hog Bounty Hunter]

Now let me get this straight, you think that we will beat Mo St worse than USC will beat us?

[TulsaHawg]

Now let me get this straight, you think that we will beat Mo St worse than USC will beat us?

Yes!

[Thehammer]

Now let me get this straight, you think that we will beat Mo St worse than USC will beat us?

That's not what I posted.  I posted that we are far superior talent wise to Mizzou State than USC is compared to our talent.

We can line up and run base plays against Mizzou State,  sub liberally with second and third teamers and still win by 20 points.

USC cannot do those things against us and win by 20 points. 

[Hog Bounty Hunter]

Now let me get this straight, you think that we will beat Mo St worse than USC will beat us?

That's not what I posted. I posted that we are far superior talent wise to Mizzou State than USC is compared to our talent.

We can line up and run base plays against Mizzou State, sub liberally with second and third teamers and still win by 20 points.

USC cannot do those things against us and win by 20 points.

So you are saying USC will beat us worse but they are not as far superior to us as we are to Mo St?

[Queen Hog]

We will win both games.  Period.  Have faith.  Go hoooooooooooggggggggggggggggggggggggsss!!!!!!!!!  Show 'em you got it babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

[Thehammer]

Now let me get this straight, you think that we will beat Mo St worse than USC will beat us?

I think I've made stance clear.   I don't know what the score will be with either game.    And that wasn't the gist of my post anyway.   I think you know that. 

If you're looking for a flame war........ look elsewhere.



That's not what I posted. I posted that we are far superior talent wise to Mizzou State than USC is compared to our talent.

We can line up and run base plays against Mizzou State, sub liberally with second and third teamers and still win by 20 points.

USC cannot do those things against us and win by 20 points.

So you are saying USC will beat us worse but they are not as far superior to us as we are to Mo St?

[Thehammer]

We will win both games. Period. Have faith. Go hoooooooooooggggggggggggggggggggggggsss!!!!!!!!! Show 'em you got it babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Believe me Queenie, I'd luv to see that happen.   But the realist in me says we take it on the chin big time out at LA. 

[HogDodging]

Ol' Chuck.  He's the master of the obvious.

[Thehammer]

Now let me get this straight, you think that we will beat Mo St worse than USC will beat us?

And again, my post is not about point spreads.   I'm just saying that we could "mail in" our game against Mizzou State and USC cannot do that against us.




I think I've made stance clear. I don't know what the score will be with either game. And that wasn't the gist of my post anyway. I think you know that.

If you're looking for a flame war........ look elsewhere.



That's not what I posted. I posted that we are far superior talent wise to Mizzou State than USC is compared to our talent.

We can line up and run base plays against Mizzou State, sub liberally with second and third teamers and still win by 20 points.

USC cannot do those things against us and win by 20 points.

So you are saying USC will beat us worse but they are not as far superior to us as we are to Mo St?

Not wanting a flame war, I will say this. USC beats us by at least 14 more points than we beat Mo St.

[Queen Hog]

Remember about 6 years ago or so and our basketball team had to win 4 straight games at the SEC tourney to get to the big dance???  I said from the very beginning we would do it.  We had to play Kentucky Friday night.  Everyone else told me there was no way.  Well by golly we did it.  You just never know.  Have faith. :razorback:

[Thehammer]

Remember about 6 years ago or so and our basketball team had to win 4 straight games at the SEC tourney to get to the big dance??? I said from the very beginning we would do it. We had to play Kentucky Friday night. Everyone else told me there was no way. Well by golly we did it. You just never know. Have faith. :razorback:

I can't argue with your facts and I luv your passion for the hogs.   LOL.

[junkyardhog]

Now let me get this straight, you think that we will beat Mo St worse than USC will beat us?

That's not what I posted. I posted that we are far superior talent wise to Mizzou State than USC is compared to our talent.

We can line up and run base plays against Mizzou State, sub liberally with second and third teamers and still win by 20 points.

USC cannot do those things against us and win by 20 points.

So you are saying USC will beat us worse but they are not as far superior to us as we are to Mo St?

Jeez skip, no one knows what you are saying. Lithium?

[Fletch]

USC will NOT beat us by more than we beat MS. USC game IMO will be closer than many think.

[Biggus Piggus]

Chuck also said that there's gonna be a Super Bowl this year.