Welcome to Hogville!      Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Quick offensive line update

Started by Biggus Piggus, September 27, 2016, 07:46:49 pm

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rude1

Quote from: ErieHog on September 28, 2016, 10:45:54 am
There was absolutely nothing wrong with the play calling.     There was tremendous failure in execution.  The two are quite different.
I have to disagree with this, if you get as many chances as we did at point blank range yet could never get the push needed to get in, I find it difficult to belive it boils down to simple execution, when it happens that many times I am led to believe they are better than us in those heavy packages and it would have been wise to alter the play calling to account for this.

Cinco de Hogo

Quote from: Biggus Piggus on September 28, 2016, 09:39:21 am
More like

LT - 6-10, 319
LG - 6-4, 318
C - 6-5, 319
RG - 6-4, 327
RT - 6-6, 335

That would get the averages up to 6-6, 324.

You got names for those boys?  I don't want to look it up. 😊

 

hawg66

They actually outsmarted themselves on the sweep to Hatcher I think. They gave the look of the misdirection pitch on that play. Walker actually went wide to the right at the snap. The DE on the back side crashed and almost fell down when he saw Walker and tried to stop. If they had pitched it to him he'd have walked in. One of the problems Saturday was that Walker was the only back they could depend on to block. Williams was running it well but also  whiffed on  some blitzes

Biggus Piggus

Quote from: rude1 on September 28, 2016, 12:17:13 pm
I have to disagree with this, if you get as many chances as we did at point blank range yet could never get the push needed to get in, I find it difficult to belive it boils down to simple execution, when it happens that many times I am led to believe they are better than us in those heavy packages and it would have been wise to alter the play calling to account for this.

Ask players to do what they can't  -- offense and defense -- and it's not the players' fault.
[CENSORED]!

FANONTHEHILL

Quote from: hawg66 on September 28, 2016, 12:54:20 pm
They actually outsmarted themselves on the sweep to Hatcher I think. They gave the look of the misdirection pitch on that play. Walker actually went wide to the right at the snap. The DE on the back side crashed and almost fell down when he saw Walker and tried to stop. If they had pitched it to him he'd have walked in. One of the problems Saturday was that Walker was the only back they could depend on to block. Williams was running it well but also  whiffed on  some blitzes
There was a missed assignment on the reverse that cost them the TD.  The receiver was supposed to kick the end inside to help Skipper, thenturn out to block #23.  Instead, he double teamed the end, leaving #23 unblocked.  Just one of several  mistakes they will work to correct this week.
Favorite quote from practice.  Made to my son:<br /><br /><br />Technique is nice, but it comes down to this.  Block the F'er in front of you. - Sam Pittman 2015

ErieHog

Quote from: GuvHog on September 28, 2016, 12:00:08 pm
How many times did you see the Hogs go 2 or 3 wide at WR when they got the ball inside A&M's 10 yard line??

A good number of them.   I think we only went 4 wide once, in the entire game.   

Formations are a thing where we had a fair bit of variety.

No cause, ever, in the history of all mankind, has produced more cold-blooded tyrants, more slaughtered innocents, and more orphans than socialism with power. It surpassed, exponentially, all other systems of production in turning out the dead. The bodies are all around us. And here is the problem: No one talks about them. No one honors them. No one does penance for them. No one has committed suicide for having been an apologist for those who did this to them. No one pays for them. No one is hunted down to account for them. It is exactly what Solzhenitsyn foresaw in The Gulag Archipelago: "No, no one would have to answer. No one would be looked into." Until that happens, there is no "after socialism."

OLjunkie

Quote from: Biggus Piggus on September 28, 2016, 09:39:21 am
More like

LT - 6-10, 319
LG - 6-4, 318
C - 6-5, 319
RG - 6-4, 327
RT - 6-6, 335

That would get the averages up to 6-6, 324.

Fat does not play.  Give me the strongest and most athletic everyday. 

Smokehouse

Quote from: ErieHog on September 28, 2016, 10:55:20 am
We tried a ton of different things in the red zone;  the problem wasn't  stubbornness.

As frustrating as the A&M goal line stands were, what if there had been another camera angle that showed Allen got the ball in before his knee was down and we score on third down after taking the clock on the third quarter almost all the way out? CBB's "stubbornness" probably gets put in the positive column then for keeping an A&M offense that blew up our defensive adjustments in the second half off the field while taking the lead. Game of inches, as they say.
QuoteSometimes a warrior just has to lay down on the ground there for a minute and just have a good bleed. Just bleed.

Words of wisdom from John Pelphrey.

HawginFL1991

One thing I think we are witnessing is the fact that for the last two years we were blessed with having the same line working together. If you look back at the participation log for last year, outside of the UTEP, TN-Martin, and maybe the Missouri game, these guys who are playing now have had no game experience. Add to that Hjalte being new to offense (heck new to football really) and a grad transfer there is no continuity to speak of. I believe they will continue to improve, what that looks like end is anybody's guess. I hope that the one silver lining in all this is that some depth develops. :razorback:

razorsharptusk

Quote from: rude1 on September 28, 2016, 12:17:13 pm
I have to disagree with this, if you get as many chances as we did at point blank range yet could never get the push needed to get in, I find it difficult to belive it boils down to simple execution, when it happens that many times I am led to believe they are better than us in those heavy packages and it would have been wise to alter the play calling to account for this.

Coach B. said in the interview that we are not able to win on those plays yet up front with the O line.  We can't get the push that we had last year.  But they are working on it and will get there.
GO HOGS!!

GuvHog

Quote from: ErieHog on September 28, 2016, 07:57:41 pm
A good number of them.   I think we only went 4 wide once, in the entire game.   

Formations are a thing where we had a fair bit of variety.



It seemed to me like every time the Hogs got the ball inside A&M's 10 yard line they went to 2 TEs, brought everyone in tight, and tried to ram the ball down A&M's throats.
Bleeding Razorback Red Since Birth!!!

DeltaBoy

They got a chance to get some work done this weekend.
If the South should lose, it means that the history of the heroic struggle will be written by the enemy, that our youth will be trained by Northern school teachers, will be impressed by all of the influences of history and education to regard our gallant dead as traitors and our maimed veterans as fit subjects for derision.
-- Major General Patrick Cleburne
The Confederacy had no better soldiers
than the Arkansans--fearless, brave, and oftentimes courageous beyond
prudence. Dickart History of Kershaws Brigade.