Pages:
Actions
  • #51 by mizzouman on 12 Jul 2017
  • I used to coach in missouri and I thought the football overall was pathetic to what I was accustomed in Arkansas. Football just seems slow and underwhelming in missouri. Who would win if this game ever took place..no clue... But i would venture that arkansas produces a larger amount of athletes.
    Interesting. My brother in law is a head coach at a big school in STL and tells a different story. I guess it's just your experiences.
  • #52 by Wildhog on 12 Jul 2017
  • Compare records, final top 25 rankings, head to head competition and first round draft picks over the last 10 years. Then come back and we can discuss.

    Don't worry Zou.  I'm embracing the rivalry.  We're as unwanted as you.
  • #53 by mizzouman on 12 Jul 2017
  • Don't worry Zou.  I'm embracing the rivalry.  We're as unwanted as you.
    Ha, love it. We are both red headed step children. Or maybe that's just Biesel
  • #54 by #1 STUNNA on 12 Jul 2017
  • Interesting. My brother in law is a head coach at a big school in STL and tells a different story. I guess it's just your experiences.

    And that very well could be it.... Alot more pro style offenses... compared to the spread offenses that alot of the Arkansas schools run...
     I do know Bentonville is 5-2 against missouri schools and Fayetteville is 4-1 against them.. but that probably doesnt mean much.
  • #55 by #1 STUNNA on 12 Jul 2017
  • and Harber is 4-6 angainst missouri schools.
  • #56 by Wildhog on 12 Jul 2017
  • Ha, love it. We are both red headed step children. Or maybe that's just Biesel

    Oh, he's a soulless bastard.
  • #57 by #1 STUNNA on 12 Jul 2017
  • The school I coached at which was Clinton High school which is bigger than the Arkansas school I played at (Warren) would have finished close to last in our conference almost every year.
  • #58 by mizzouman on 12 Jul 2017
  • And that very well could be it.... Alot more pro style offenses... compared to the spread offenses that alot of the Arkansas schools run...
     I do know Bentonville is 5-2 against missouri schools and Fayetteville is 4-1 against them.. but that probably doesnt mean much.
    Could be. I do know that those two Arkansas teams have had good success against some Missouri teams. That is a fact. But if you took the top 40 players from each state, generally, Missouri will more talent on the field top to bottom.
  • #59 by mizzouman on 12 Jul 2017
  • Oh, he's a soulless bastard.
    He's having some fun his senior year and apparently has gotten under the skin of Arkansans, even the media. That's rare.
  • #60 by mizzouman on 12 Jul 2017
  • The school I coached at which was Clinton High school which is bigger than the Arkansas school I played at (Warren) would have finished close to last in our conference almost every year.
    Clinton, still small. STL has some serious players coming up and have had some great ones in the past.
  • #61 by RyanMallettsEgo on 12 Jul 2017
  • Could be. I do know that those two Arkansas teams have had good success against some Missouri teams. That is a fact. But if you took the top 40 players from each state, generally, Missouri will more talent on the field top to bottom.

    Define "talent" in this instance.
  • #62 by Wildhog on 12 Jul 2017
  • He's having some fun his senior year and apparently has gotten under the skin of Arkansans, even the media. That's rare.

    It was a South Park reference.  Since he's a ginger.  Sorry.
  • #63 by onebadrubi on 12 Jul 2017
  • Brain fart.

    Got to pass that peace pipe every once in awhile.  Haha
  • #64 by BluegrassRazorback on 12 Jul 2017
  • Compare records, final top 25 rankings, head to head competition and first round draft picks over the last 10 years. Then come back and we can discuss.

    It doesn't mater the discussion or you stats

    Being connected to Mizzou doesn't help Ark improve - no gain in being connected to Mizzou

    Arkansas needs to improve itself -

    Connections with Mizzou only makes us Kansaw

    Now that was a national level game everyone in the nation wanted to see? Lol

    In fact we don't help you either

    For Arkansas and - yes Mizxou - to improve

    Our being a rival means absolutely nothing in college football

    It's SEC front office Astro turf to keep both programs in the lower tier

    If they wanted better teams you would be playing Tex A&M and we would still have LSU that last regular weekend

    This arrangement only assures the rich get richer and we stay in the lower levels

    5 star at his being offered by Ark/Mizzou

    Sane 5 star by LSU/TAMU

    " On thanks giving weekendvyou can be seen on national TV playing gay at LSzu/TANU - or - you can let your family watch you on a regional broadcast of Ark vS Mizzou"

    Well that's an easy answer for the kid -
    Mizzou doesn't help Ark

    Love to play Mizzou sometime in Oct

    Rival weekend - what a yawner

  • #65 by mizzouman on 12 Jul 2017
  • Define "talent" in this instance.
    Those who would most likely go to the NFL.
  • #66 by mizzouman on 12 Jul 2017
  • It doesn't mater the discussion or you stats

    Being connected to Mizzou doesn't help Ark improve - no gain in being connected to Mizzou

    Arkansas needs to improve itself -

    Connections with Mizzou only makes us Kansaw

    Now that was a national level game everyone in the nation wanted to see? Lol

    In fact we don't help you either

    For Arkansas and - yes Mizxou - to improve

    Our being a rival means absolutely nothing in college football

    It's SEC front office Astro turf to keep both programs in the lower tier

    If they wanted better teams you would be playing Tex A&M and we would still have LSU that last regular weekend

    This arrangement only assures the rich get richer and we stay in the lower levels

    5 star at his being offered by Ark/Mizzou

    Sane 5 star by LSU/TAMU

    " On thanks giving weekendvyou can be seen on national TV playing gay at LSzu/TANU - or - you can let your family watch you on a regional broadcast of Ark vS Mizzou"

    Well that's an easy answer for the kid -
    Mizzou doesn't help Ark

    Love to play Mizzou sometime in Oct

    Rival weekend - what a yawner


    Ok, I don't think I follow this 'getting better' rant but if that's how you feel, I'm fine with it.
  • #67 by jbcarol on 13 Jul 2017

  • #68 by GuvHog on 13 Jul 2017
  • It doesn't mater the discussion or you stats

    Being connected to Mizzou doesn't help Ark improve - no gain in being connected to Mizzou

    Arkansas needs to improve itself -

    Connections with Mizzou only makes us Kansaw

    Now that was a national level game everyone in the nation wanted to see? Lol

    In fact we don't help you either

    For Arkansas and - yes Mizxou - to improve

    Our being a rival means absolutely nothing in college football

    It's SEC front office Astro turf to keep both programs in the lower tier

    If they wanted better teams you would be playing Tex A&M and we would still have LSU that last regular weekend

    This arrangement only assures the rich get richer and we stay in the lower levels

    5 star at his being offered by Ark/Mizzou

    Sane 5 star by LSU/TAMU

    " On thanks giving weekendvyou can be seen on national TV playing gay at LSzu/TANU - or - you can let your family watch you on a regional broadcast of Ark vS Mizzou"

    Well that's an easy answer for the kid -
    Mizzou doesn't help Ark

    Love to play Mizzou sometime in Oct

    Rival weekend - what a yawner



    Since when is the Arkansas - Missouri game a regional broadcast???
  • #69 by jbcarol on 13 Jul 2017
  • #70 by jbcarol on 14 Jul 2017
  • #71 by HillBillyHogfan on 14 Jul 2017
  • A better name than "Battle Line Rivalry."

    Just awful.  Why do we have to let Bazzel name freaking everything?

    Touche
Pages:
Actions